Knowledge Generation in Colombia's Science Centers for the development of scientific capabilities in citizens.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51660/ripl.v1i1.10Keywords:
Science center, knowledge management, Public participation, Scientific communication, Social impactAbstract
Objective. To examine the role of the most prominent Science Centers in Colombia -Maloka, Explora, the District Planetarium and the Botanical Garden of Medellin- in the programs developed during the last decade. Method. A detailed review was used, highlighting the diversity of activities, audiences and themes addressed by each center. The impact of these programs on the local and national community is analyzed, as well as the challenges faced and opportunities for improvement identified. Results. This study contributes to make visible the important work of these centers in the promotion of science and education in Colombia, and offers recommendations to strengthen their impact in the future. Conclusions. The results presented evidence the relevant and significant role of science centers in the country, emphasizing how the appropriation of knowledge is only possible if there is a robust, empathetic and decisive policy for legislation that allows the investment of sufficient public resources in these institutions, as they are committed to social development in a broad spectrum.
Downloads
References
• Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer - a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
• Bandelli, A., Konijn, E. A., & Willems, J. W. (2009). The need for public participation in the governance of science centers. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(2), 89-104.
• Bandelli, A., & Konijn, E. A. (2012). Science Centers and Public Participation: Methods, Strategies, and Barriers. Science Communication, 35(4), 419–448.
• Blanco-Valbuena, C. E., & Falla-Morales, S. (2023). Participación de los públicos, inclusión social e innovación en la Gobernanza de los Centros de Ciencia en Colombia. Revista Interamericana de Investigación, Educación y Pedagogía, 16(1), 269-318. https://doi.org/10.15332/25005421.8009
• Blanco-Valbuena, C.E. (2021). Centros de Ciencia en Colombia: intercambio de conocimiento tácito entre los mediadores y el público en la Comunicación de la Ciencia. Revista Interamericana de Investigación, Educación y Pedagogía, 14(2), 317-371. https://doi.org/10.15332/25005421.6641
• Bloodgood, J.M., & Salisbury, W.D. (2001). Understanding the influence of organizational change strategies on information technology and knowledge management strategies. Decision Support Systems, 31(1), 55-69.
• Cameron, F. (2005). Contentiousness and shifting knowledge paradigms: The roles of history and science museums in contemporary societies. Museum Management and Curatorship, 20(3), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. musmancur.2005.05.002
• Carlile, P., & Rebentisch, E. (2003). Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science, 49, 1180-95.
• Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2002). Knowledge management strategy and its link to knowledge creation process. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(3), 173-187.
• Christensen, P.H. (2003). Knowledge Sharing – Time Sensitiveness and Pushpull Strategies in a Non-hype Organization. EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.
• Danilov, V.J. (1982). Science and technology centres. Cambridge, MT, The MIT Press.
• Da Empoli, G. (2006). Comunicating of Science: Competing for attention, European Commission Directorate-General for Research. Information and Communication Unit. https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/
competition/economist/eagcp.html
• Delicado, A. (2009). Scientific controversies in museums: notes from a semiperipherical country. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508098577
• Einsiedel, A.A., & Einsiedel, E.F. (2004). Museums as agora: Diversifying approaches to engaging publics in research. In D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo, & B.V. Lewenstein (Eds.), Creating connections: Museums and the public understanding of current research, 73-86. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
• Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
• Falk, J.H., & Dierking, L.D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, Whalesback Books.
• Gibbert, M., & Krause, H. (2002). Practice exchange in a best practice marketplace. In T.H. Davenport & G.J.B. Probst (Eds.), Knowledge Management Case Book: Best practices, 68-84. Publicis MCD.
• Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers. Blanco. Generación de Conocimiento en los Centros de Ciencia de Colombia para el desarrollo de capacidades científicas en los ciudadanos
• Grant, R., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 17-22.
• Gray, D.E. (2009). Doing Research in the Real World (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 105–117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Iansiti, M., & Clark, K.B. (1994). Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 557–605.
• Intezari, A., Taskin, N., & Pauleen, D. (2017). Looking beyond knowledge sharing: an integrative approach to knowledge management culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 492-515.
• Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1992). Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. In L. Werin & H. Wijkander (Eds.), Contract Economics, 251-74. Basil Blackwell.
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the ultinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625-46.
• Liebowitz, J. (2002). Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Systems with Applications, 20, 1-6.
• McLean, K. (1993). Planning for people in museum exhibitions. Washington, Association of Science-Technology Centres.
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-66.
• Newman, W.L. (1994). Social research methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
• Nonaka, I. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3).
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1991). The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press.
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
• Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-critical Philosophy.Harper Torchbooks.
• Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and Being. University of Chicago.
• Quinn, J.B. (1992). Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. New York: Free Press.
• Regeer, B. (2004). Wetenschapscommunicatie in de agora: Veranderende relaties tussen wetenschap en samenleving [Science communication in the agora: Changing relationships between science and society]. In C.J. Hamelink, I. van Veen & J. Willems (Eds.), Interactieve Wetenschapscommunicatie, 11937. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Coutinho.
• Sánchez-Mora, M. (2004). Los museos de ciencia, promotores de la cultura científica. Elementos: ciencia y cultura, 11(053), 35-43.
Blanco. Generación de Conocimiento en los Centros de Ciencia de Colombia para 32 el desarrollo de capacidades científicas en los ciudadanos
• Semper, R.J. (1990). ‘Science museums as environments for learning’. Physics Today, (November, 1990), 2-8.
• Shani, A., Sena, J., & Olin, T. (2003). Knowledge management and new product development: A study of two companies. European Journal of Innovation management, 6(3), 137-149.
• Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital. Currency/ Doubleday.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1989). Tracing Lines of Conditional Influence: Matrix and Paths. Paper delivered at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Society, San Francisco, California,
• Testa, A. (2006). Comunicating of Science: Dialogue with society. Commission Directorate-General for Research, Information and Communication Unit, Brussels.
• Van den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J.A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context - The influence of organisational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
• Von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Aben, M. (2001). Making the most of your company’s knowledge: A strategic framework. Long Range Planning, 34(4), 421-439.
• Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76-92.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Carlos E. Blanco Valbuena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
