Evaluations of government performance and retrospective voting: episodes of incumbency and anti-incumbency in Colombia between 2002 and 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51660/ripl.v1i2.43Keywords:
retrospective voting, performance voting, ownership, anti-ownership, electionsAbstract
Objective. To describe the processes of vote distribution in the Colombian presidential elections between 2002 and 2022, approximating a recognition of the presence or absence of episodes of incumbency or anti-incumbency as a function of the average levels of approval and disapproval of the outgoing governments during each electoral process. Methodology. A qualitative case analysis was developed based on the interpretation in time series of the values reported in the competitiveness and total volatility indexes, in contrast with the mean values on the perception of government performance. Results. It was possible to verify, in dialogue with different analytical readings, that in Colombia during the last two decades there has been a latent balance between episodes of alternation and continuity, estimating that in cases where vote variations extend over limits higher or lower than the mean values of total volatility, there tends to be an association between the results with the confluence of incumbency or anti-incumbency environments.
Downloads
References
Barrero, F. y Meléndez, C. (2011). Consideraciones sobre la gobernabilidad como determinante
del comportamiento electoral en Colombia: elecciones presidenciales de 2010. Colombia
Internacional, (74), 59-87.
• Blanco, J. (2013). Estructuras clientelares y partidos políticos. Aproximaciones a la crisis y
transformación de los sistemas de partidos en Colombia y Venezuela. Revista de Relaciones
Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad, 8 (1), 207-231.
• Bochsler, D. & Hänni, M. (2019). The three stages of the anti-incumbency vote: Retrospective
economic voting in Young established democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 58,
-55.
• Bonilla-Mejía, L. & Higuera-Mendienta, I. (2017), Political aligment in the time of weak parties:
electoral advantages and subnational transfers in Colombia. Banco de la República, Documentos
de trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana, 260.
• Botero, F., Losada, R., & Wills-Otero, L. (2016). “Sistema de partidos en Colombia (1974-
: ¿la evolución hacia el multipartidismo?”. F. Freidenberg (Ed.). Los sistemas de partido
en América Latina: 1978-2015. Cono Sur y Países Andinos, Tomo II. Ciudad de México:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México e Instituto Nacional Electoral, 339-400.
• Carlin, R., Singer, M., & Zechmeister, E. (Eds.). (2015). The Latin American Voter: Pursuing
Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. University of Michigan Press.
https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8402589Coppedge et al., 2022)
• Dargent, E., & Muñoz, P. (2013). ¿Democracia contra partidos? Desinstitucionalización del
sistema de partidos en Colombia. Politai, 4(7).
• Došek, T. (2014). “¿Por qué la gente vota a la izquierda? Clivajes, ideología y voto retrospectivo
en Bolivia y Uruguay en perspectiva comparada. DADOS – Revista de Ciencias Sociais, 57 (3),
-815.
• Druckman, N., Kifer, M. & Parkin, M. (2020). “Campaign rhetoric and the incumbency
advantage”. American Politics Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, 22-43.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Julio César Castiblanco Sierra (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.